Comparison

Logwo vs
Email & WhatsApp.

Most freight teams still manage quotes by email and WhatsApp. It works — until it doesn't. Here's what a structured RFQ process actually changes.

The six problems email can't solve

Why email-based freight quoting breaks down

📬
The problem

Quotes buried in inboxes

Each forwarder replies in their own format — PDF attachments, email body, WhatsApp voice notes. Consolidating them means copying numbers manually into a spreadsheet.

Logwo fixes this

All quotes arrive in a structured dashboard, formatted identically. No inbox digging.

The problem

Slow vendor responses

An email to a forwarder sits in their inbox. An RFQ link with a deadline, clear specs, and branded presentation gets treated with more urgency.

Logwo fixes this

Vendors receive a professional branded RFQ with cargo details and a deadline. Response rates increase from ~50% to 80–95%.

📊
The problem

No apples-to-apples comparison

Vendor A quotes all-in. Vendor B quotes base rate only. Vendor C quotes in AED while others quote in USD. You can't compare what you can't standardise.

Logwo fixes this

Logwo's quote form standardises the response structure. Every vendor fills in the same fields — price, transit time, validity, notes. Direct comparison, every time.

🔍
The problem

No audit trail

Who approved the accepted quote? When was it sent? Which vendors were invited? In an email-based process, this lives in someone's personal inbox.

Logwo fixes this

Every RFQ, every invite, every quote, and every acceptance is logged with timestamps in Logwo's activity log.

🤖
The problem

No intelligence layer

Email can't tell you that Vendor C's quote is 23% above the statistical average for your trade lane. You only see what you can compare manually.

Logwo fixes this

Logwo AI flags quote outliers and explains deviations in plain English — so you know immediately which quotes deserve scrutiny.

📎
The problem

Documents scattered across inboxes

Your Bill of Lading is in one email, the Certificate of Origin in another, the packing list in a WhatsApp thread. No single source of truth.

Logwo fixes this

Every document attaches to the relevant shipment in Logwo. Shareable via secure link to customs agents — no email forwarding.

Common questions

Can my vendors still email their quotes if they prefer?

Vendors receive an email from Logwo with a link to a simple quote form. They fill in the form — which takes 2–3 minutes — and submit. No login or registration required. The experience is email-native: they click a link, fill a form, done.

Will my forwarders actually use a new system?

Friction is minimal — vendors don't need accounts, and the quoting form is simple. Most shippers report that forwarders adapt immediately, especially when they see they receive more structured RFQs with clear specs. Some vendors prefer structured digital quoting because it reduces miscommunication.

What if I still want to communicate with vendors by WhatsApp for relationship reasons?

Logwo handles the structured quoting workflow — it doesn't replace your vendor relationships. You can continue WhatsApp conversations for context, questions, and relationship-building. The formal quote submission happens via Logwo, giving you the audit trail without changing how you communicate.

How is Logwo different from just using a better email template?

An email template standardises what you send, but not what comes back. Logwo standardises both sides — the RFQ sent and the quote received — and adds the comparison dashboard, analytics, shipment tracking, and document management that email simply cannot provide.

Switch in 15 minutes

Send your next RFQ through Logwo.

Free plan: 3 RFQs/month, 2 vendors. Your forwarders don't need accounts to quote. No credit card required.